Best Cookie Consent Tools in 2026: 11 CMPs Tested, Scored, and Ranked

Cookiebot is the best cookie consent tool overall in 2026, scoring 4.0 out of 5. It leads on automatic scanning accuracy and Google Consent Mode certifications. We tested 11 platforms, from free WordPress plugins to enterprise CMPs with IAB TCF support.

Below: a score-ranked quick list, a full comparison table, and our evaluation framework. Each tool gets a scored review with verified pricing and documented user sentiment.

Disclosure: Consently publishes this guide and appears at rank 9 of 11 by its earned score of 3.7.

What Are the Best Cookie Consent Tools?

The 11 best cookie consent tools in 2026, ranked by overall methodology score, lead with Cookiebot, Cookie Script, and Complianz. The full ranking, each with its score and “best for” angle, follows below.

1. Cookiebot (4.0/5): best for automatic cookie scanning accuracy; 13,000+ cookie repository, Google Gold Tier, 47+ languages

2. Cookie Script (4.0/5): best for developers who want granular control; headless scanner, 100,000-cookie database, white-label agency layer

3. Complianz (3.9/5): best free option for WordPress; 1M+ installs, self-hosted, IAB TCF certified, no pageview caps

4. CookieHub (3.9/5): best for a certified, simple multi-site banner; ISO 27001, Google-certified, session-based pricing

5. Osano (3.9/5): best for the no-fines pledge and a full privacy program; $500,000 penalty guarantee (higher tiers), DSAR included

6. Enzuzo (3.9/5): best for agencies and Shopify or Webflow stores; six legal generators, real DSAR, Google-certified CMP

7. CookieYes (3.8/5): best for budget WordPress beginners; 1.5M+ installs, free up to 5,000 pageviews, ISO 27001

8. Termly (3.8/5): best for free policy generation and consent together; 10 attorney-crafted generators, Google Gold Tier

9. Consently (3.7/5): best for agencies that need flat multi-domain pricing; 5 domains for $199/yr, all features on every plan

10. iubenda (3.6/5): best for legal documents plus consent in one suite; 2,400+ lawyer-drafted clauses, 27 languages, ISO 27001

11. OneTrust (3.6/5): best for large enterprise governance; 45M-cookie database, 250+ languages, A/B testing, Gartner/Forrester leader

We scored every platform, including our own Consently, on seven weighted dimensions. Compliance and scanning carry the most weight, then banner, setup, and pricing, with performance and support weighted least.

Scores come from live pricing pages, certification records, documentation, hands-on trials, and verified user reviews on G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot. See how we score every consent platform for the full rubric.

What Is a Cookie Consent Tool?

A cookie consent tool, also called a consent management platform (CMP), manages cookie compliance on your site. It displays a consent banner, scans and auto-blocks trackers before consent, and logs each visitor’s decision. It also signals Google Consent Mode v2 and IAB TCF to keep analytics and ad-tech compliant.

These platforms handle three distinct jobs. The first is the user-facing banner (accept, reject, or manage preferences). The second is blocking non-essential scripts before a visitor consents. The third is the compliance record, a timestamped log you can produce during an audit.

GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, and similar laws require informed, documented consent before placing non-essential cookies. A cookie consent tool turns that legal requirement into a manageable one-time setup. Without one, every analytics tag, ad pixel, and third-party tracker fires unconditionally. That exposes the site owner to regulatory fines and, increasingly, private-party lawsuits like the wave of CIPA Meta Pixel claims.

The tools vary most on how much a CMP costs as you add sites. They also differ on whether the free tier is genuinely useful, how accurately they scan, and which laws and certifications they cover. Those differences are what the next section covers.

What Should You Look for in a Cookie Consent Tool?

Five attributes separate a tool worth buying from one that creates problems. They are pricing structure, free-tier reality, scanning accuracy, compliance certifications, and platform fit. Learn how to choose a consent platform for the full buyer’s guide; the criteria below are the ranking drivers.

Pricing model and the real cost as you add sites

Per-domain pricing (Cookiebot, CookieYes, Cookie Script, iubenda, Termly) is the most common model and the most punishing at scale. Cookiebot charges $8 to $96 per domain per month depending on traffic; CookieYes charges $10 to $55 per domain per month. Running five domains on CookieYes Ultimate costs $2,750 per year.

Two traps deserve attention. Cookiebot’s plan auto-upgrades when a site’s subpage count crosses a tier threshold, and it counts each subdomain as a separate domain. Session- or visitor-metered pricing (CookieHub, Osano, Enzuzo) is predictable on a single site, but it can surprise agencies when visitor volumes spike.

Flat-capacity pricing (Consently) bundles a set number of domains and pageviews at a fixed annual price, which makes multi-site cost predictable. The pricing-model differences are the single biggest driver of total cost over time.

A free tier, and what “free” actually costs

The free-tier reality splits three ways: a genuinely useful free-forever plan, a stripped freemium teaser, or trial-only access. Eight of the eleven tools here offer a free-forever tier, each with its own caps:

Complianz: free on WordPress, no pageview or record caps, no watermark
Cookie Script: 10 pages, 2 domains
CookieYes: 5,000 pageviews, 100 pages per scan
CookieHub: 1,000 sessions per month
Osano: 5,000 visitors per month
Enzuzo: 5,000 visitors per month
Termly: 1 policy, 10,000 views, quarterly scans, watermark
iubenda: under 1,000 pageviews

Three does not offer a free-forever plan. Cookiebot is freemium (50 subpages, 1 domain, no auto-blocking), Consently offers a 14-day trial only, and OneTrust has no free option.

A separate category sits outside this list: fully free, lightweight banner scripts like Silktide Consent Manager, Ketch Free, and TermsFeed. They rank well for “free cookie consent” and suit a simple static site. They trade away automatic scanning, a managed dashboard, and a scored compliance record, so they are not in this scored roundup.

The catch with the paid tools is that free tiers are narrowing. CookieYes moved banner color customization to its paid tier in 2025. Termly’s free tier adds a Termly watermark. CookieHub’s free tier excludes IAB TCF and GPC. See the full comparison of best free cookie consent options.

Cookie scanning and auto-blocking before consent

Scanning accuracy determines how complete your consent record is. Cookiebot’s 13,000+ cookie repository is the category benchmark; Cookie Script’s headless scanner reads 100,000+ cookies across any platform. Complianz scans the homepage plus five pages per load, which can miss cookies loaded only on deeper pages.

Prior blocking is the harder problem. Several tools leak scripts before consent is given under certain configurations. CookieHub’s vendor-documented note states that auto-blocking “may malfunction” behind WP Rocket, LiteSpeed Cache, or Cloudflare Rocket Loader.

Consently’s own feedback board documents a script-leak issue: scripts can execute partially before consent if not manually wrapped. Advanced script blocking is listed as in progress.

Test the tool on your own site before relying on it for compliance. No scanner is exhaustive, and misconfigured caching can defeat even well-implemented blocking.

Compliance coverage and certifications

At minimum, a tool should cover GDPR and CCPA. The meaningful differentiation is in certifications. Four matter most:

Google Consent Mode v2, to preserve Analytics and Ads measurement
IAB TCF, required for programmatic ad-tech
Google CMP certification, where Gold or Platinum signals quality to Google
ISO 27001, a data-security audit standard

Cookiebot, Termly, and Enzuzo hold Google Gold Tier certification. CookieYes, iubenda, and OneTrust hold ISO 27001. OneTrust leads on pure compliance breadth (45M-cookie database, 250+ languages, CTV SDKs, A/B testing). Consently’s Google CMP listing is pending, not yet approved, and holds no ISO certification.

IAB TCF 2.3 is current. IAB TCF 2.2 is the previous version; most tools have migrated.

Ease of setup and platform fit

Every tool here offers a one-line JavaScript script and a Google Tag Manager path. The meaningful differences are native platform integrations. Complianz is WordPress and Shopify only. CookieYes has a native WordPress plugin and 1.5M+ installs. Enzuzo has native Shopify and Webflow integrations.

For WordPress sites, a native WP.org plugin dramatically reduces setup friction. For Shopify stores, a native app that integrates with Shopify’s Customer Privacy API is the cleanest path. For agencies managing multiple sites, multi-site dashboard access and flat or per-domain-bundled pricing both matter.

How Do the Best Cookie Consent Tools Compare?

Per-domain pricing is the cheapest entry point for a single site, but the gap widens fast at three or more sites. Complianz, Cookie Script, and Consently all undercut per-domain tools significantly at scale.

Product	Score	Best for	Starting price	Free tier	Pricing model	Terms generator	Consent Mode v2 + IAB TCF
Cookiebot	4.0/5	Scanning accuracy	$8/mo per domain	Freemium (50 subpages, 1 domain)	Per-domain	No	Yes + IAB TCF 2.3
Cookie Script	4.0/5	Developer control	EUR8/mo per domain	Yes (10 pages, 2 domains)	Per-domain	No	Yes + IAB TCF 2.3 (PLUS only)
Complianz	3.9/5	Free WordPress	$59/yr (1 site)	Yes (WordPress, unlimited)	Per-site annual	No	Yes + IAB TCF
CookieHub	3.9/5	Certified simple multi-site	EUR6/mo	Yes (1,000 sessions)	Session-metered	No	Yes + IAB TCF (Business plan)
Osano	3.9/5	No-fines pledge	$199/mo	Yes (5,000 visitors)	Visitor-metered	No	Yes + IAB TCF (paid plans)
Enzuzo	3.9/5	Agencies + Shopify/Webflow	Free to $99/mo	Yes (5,000 visitors)	Visitor-metered	Yes	Yes + IAB TCF
CookieYes	3.8/5	Budget WordPress	$10/mo per domain	Yes (5,000 pageviews)	Per-domain	No	Yes + IAB TCF 2.3
Termly	3.8/5	Policy + consent bundle	$10/mo per site	Yes (1 policy, 10k views, watermark)	Per-site	Yes	Yes + IAB TCF 2.3
Consently	3.7/5	Flat multi-domain pricing	$99/yr (1 domain)	No (14-day trial)	Flat capacity	Yes	Yes + IAB TCF 2.3
iubenda	3.6/5	Legal docs + consent	EUR4.99/mo per site	Yes (under 1,000 pageviews)	Per-site	Yes	Yes + IAB TCF 2.2
OneTrust	3.6/5	Enterprise governance	~$10,000/yr (quote)	No	Quote-only	No	Yes + IAB TCF

Prices verified as of June 2026. Visit each product’s pricing page for current rates.

1. Cookiebot: Best for Automatic Cookie Scanning Accuracy

Cookiebot scores 4.0/5 on our methodology and is the top-ranked tool in this list. It earns that score primarily through the strongest scanning infrastructure in the category.

Key Features

Cookiebot pairs a deep scanning engine with full Google ad-tech credentials. The standout capabilities are below.

Automatic scanning against a 13,000+ cookie repository, with support for 47+ languages on the consent banner
Google Gold Tier certification plus Google Consent Mode v2 and IAB TCF 2.3 on all paid plans
Automatic Global Privacy Control (GPC) honoring, where most competitors require manual configuration
Freemium entry at 50 subpages and 1 domain; monthly rescans on paid plans; no Terms generator

Pros

The strengths center on scanning depth and ad-tech reliability.

The automatic scanning feature is genuinely thorough. Finding and categorizing every cookie without manual tagging is what sets the tier-1 tools apart from simpler banners.
Google Gold Tier certification and 47+ languages make it a strong choice for international sites. You get ad-tech compliance and multilingual banners in one platform.
GPC signal handling works automatically, which saves configuration time compared to tools that require a manual GPC flag.

Cons

The limitations cluster around cost-at-scale and support gating.

Subdomain billing is the sharpest limitation. Each subdomain (shop.example.com, app.example.com) is billed as a separate domain, which stacks costs fast for larger sites.
The plan auto-upgrades silently when a site’s subpage count crosses a tier threshold. One TrustRadius reviewer described going “back and forth with their so-called customer service regarding the bogus variances of monthly charges” after an unexpected upgrade.
No Terms and Conditions generator; teams needing legal documents alongside consent must use a separate tool.
Email support only on lower tiers; live chat requires a higher plan.

Pricing

Cookiebot offers a freemium tier: 1 domain, 50 subpages, and monthly scanning. Paid Premium tiers run per domain, priced by subpage count, from $8/mo (Lite) to $96/mo (XLarge). Premium Small is $16/mo per domain at four or more domains, or $34/mo for one to three. Each subdomain is billed as a separate domain. See Cookiebot’s current pricing for exact tier limits.

What Users Say

Reviewers praise the scanning automation but flag billing surprises. One G2 review calls the automatic scanning “super helpful, finding all cookies without manual effort.” Billing draws the sharpest complaints. One TrustRadius reviewer cited “bogus variances of monthly charges” and slow support.

For a deeper evaluation, see our full Cookiebot review, the Cookiebot alternatives roundup, and the Consently vs Cookiebot head-to-head.

2. Cookie Script: Best for Developers Who Want Granular Control

Cookie Script scores 4.0/5 and ties Cookiebot on the overall score. It ranks second on a lower listicle frequency and a thinner scanning-benchmark reputation. It stands out on developer tooling and agency-layer customization.

Key Features

Cookie Script targets developers and agencies with deep tooling and rebrandable deployments.

Headless scanner accessing a 100,000+ cookie database, able to scan any platform (not WordPress-only)
White-label agency layer: rebrandable banner and account settings for client-facing deployments
Google Tag Manager integration rated as “extremely intuitive” by agency users on G2
IAB TCF 2.3 on the PLUS plan only; Consent Mode v2 on every plan
Free tier includes 10 pages and 2 domains; no live chat (email/ticket only)

Pros

The strengths show up in integration cleanliness and agency branding.

The GTM integration is one of the cleanest in the category. “CookieScript convinces me especially with its user-friendliness and fair pricing. The integration via Google Tag Manager is extremely intuitive,” noted one agency user on
A white-label layer makes this the strongest out-of-box option for agencies that need client-facing branding without building a custom solution.
Consistent ratings across platforms: Trustpilot 4.7/391, G2 4.6/505, Capterra 4.8/57.

Cons

The friction points are tier gating and account management.

IAB TCF 2.3 is gated to the PLUS plan (EUR19/mo per domain). The LITE plan omits it, which disqualifies it for programmatic ad-tech without an upgrade.
No ability to mix different plans within a single account adds administrative overhead for agencies managing sites on different contract terms. One agency CEO on G2 called this “unnecessary administrative overhead.”
No live chat support; email and ticketing only.
No Terms and Conditions generator.

Pricing

Cookie Script offers a free plan at 10 pages and 2 domains. LITE is EUR8/mo per domain and PLUS is EUR19/mo per domain. Per-domain pricing means costs compound across multiple sites. See Cookie Script’s pricing page for current tiers.

What Users Say

The recurring agency gripe is account structure, not the product itself. As Sebastien R., an agency CEO, put it: “My main frustration is the inability to mix different plans within a single account. This adds unnecessary administrative overhead.” (G2)

Read our Cookie Script review, check Cookie Script alternatives, or compare Consently vs Cookie Script side by side.

3. Complianz: Best Free Option for WordPress

Complianz scores 3.9/5 and is the strongest genuinely-free CMP for WordPress. Its self-hosted model is the deciding factor for site owners who want no pageview caps and no external data transfer.

Key Features

Complianz is built around free, self-hosted WordPress compliance with broad framework coverage.

Free on WordPress.org, 1M+ active installs; no pageview caps, no session limits, no watermark
Self-hosted data: consent records stay on your own server, not a third-party SaaS database
IAB TCF CMP ID 332 and Google CMP certification, plus support for GDPR, CCPA, and several other regimes
Shopify app available separately ($2.99 to $14.99/mo); no other platform support
Scans homepage and five pages per load (manual trigger on lower tiers)

Pros

The case for Complianz rests on cost, data residency, and certification at the free tier.

It delivers a fully certified, versatile CMP at no cost on WordPress, the rare free plugin that does not gate the serious frameworks.
Self-hosted data residency is a genuine differentiator for teams with strict data sovereignty requirements. No third-party server ever receives your consent records.
The free WordPress plugin covers IAB TCF, which most free tools gate behind a paid tier.
A WordPress.org rating of 4.7/5 across 1,639 reviews is one of the most reliable signals in the category.

Cons

The weak spots are reliability under caching and limited scan depth.

Cache-plugin conflicts are documented. WP Rocket, LiteSpeed Cache, and similar optimization plugins can prevent the banner from loading, which is a compliance gap, not just a display bug. One long-time user wrote: “Now I have to replace it. In some situations, the banner is not displayed.”
Scanning is limited to homepage plus five pages per load. Sites with cookies loaded only on deep pages or checkout flows may have incomplete scan coverage.
WordPress and Shopify only; no GTM-first, Webflow, or headless support.

Pricing

Complianz Personal is $59/yr (1 site), Professional $179/yr (5 sites), and Agency $399/yr (25 sites). The Shopify app is billed separately at $2.99 to $14.99/mo. See Complianz pricing for current tiers.

What Users Say

Reviewers consistently praise the certified-but-free combination. A G2 reviewer called it “a fully certified CMP solution that is incredibly versatile.” The recurring caveat is cache-plugin breakage, covered above.

Explore our Complianz review, Complianz alternatives, or the Consently vs Complianz comparison.

4. CookieHub: Best for a Certified, Simple Multi-Site Banner

CookieHub scores 3.9/5. Its Google-certified and ISO 27001-audited status at SMB price points is the differentiating fact for teams where certification is a procurement requirement.

Key Features

CookieHub packages enterprise-grade certifications into a session-priced SMB product.

ISO 27001 certified, Google CMP certified, IAB TCF 2.3 and GPP (on Business plan)
Session-based pricing: free at 1,000 sessions, Starter EUR6/mo, Basic EUR10/mo, Business EUR30/mo
DSAR management gated to Business plan; GPC and IAB TCF gated to Business as well
Monthly page-capped scan (not continuous or weekly)
Ticketing-only support; no live chat

Pros

The appeal is certification and predictable pricing at SMB rates.

ISO 27001 and Google CMP certification at EUR6 to EUR30/mo is unusually affordable. “Support is top notch,” notes a Trustpilot reviewer.
Session-based pricing is predictable for low-traffic sites. Teams with stable, moderate visitor counts will not hit surprise overages.
The banner UI is clean and requires minimal setup time compared to tools with more complex configuration flows.

Cons

The drawbacks are caching reliability, overage billing, and a split rating signal.

Auto-blocking “may malfunction” behind WP Rocket, LiteSpeed Cache, and Cloudflare Rocket Loader. This is vendor-documented: scripts can fire before consent if your WordPress stack uses any of these common caching tools.
EUR0.10 per 1,000 sessions overage applies once you exceed your plan’s cap; high-traffic spikes create unpredictable billing.
IAB TCF 2.3, GPC, and DSAR are all gated to the Business plan at EUR30/mo. The Starter and Basic plans do not qualify for programmatic ad-tech compliance.
The Trustpilot rating of 1.9/26 is concerning, while the G2 rating of 5.0/12 reflects a very small sample. Treat the support claims with appropriate skepticism given the score split.

Pricing

CookieHub Free covers 1,000 sessions per month. Starter is EUR6/mo, Basic EUR10/mo, Business EUR30/mo. Overage at EUR0.10 per 1,000 sessions above the plan limit. See CookieHub pricing for current tiers.

What Users Say

Sentiment is split between a small, happy G2 cohort and a weak Trustpilot score. A representative G2 review reads: “Bit costly but its worth every penny.”

Read our CookieHub review, browse CookieHub alternatives, or see Consently vs CookieHub.

5. Osano: Best for the No-Fines Pledge and a Full Privacy Program

Osano scores 3.9/5. Its “$500,000 No Fines, No Penalties” guarantee and bundled DSAR plus data-mapping tools separate it from banner-only tools. It is the only option here that positions as a full data-privacy platform rather than purely a CMP.

Key Features

Osano positions as a full privacy program, not just a banner, anchored by its penalty guarantee.

“$500,000 No Fines, No Penalties” guarantee on the Basic Privacy tier and above (the free Solo and $199 Plus plans are excluded; it covers fines a regulator issues as a result of the platform, per Osano’s Terms of Service)
One-line setup with no technical configuration required
DSAR (data subject access request) management and data-mapping included
Free Solo plan: 5,000 visitors per month; Plus at $199/mo covers 3 domains and 30,000 visitors
Named in the Google AI Overview for the category

Pros

The strengths are fast setup, program breadth, and vendor stability.

The one-line setup is genuinely fast: the banner is live in under five minutes on most sites, and reviewers cite “ease of use and responsive customer support.”
DSAR management and data mapping at the $199/mo Plus tier gives privacy-focused teams a broader compliance platform without needing a separate vendor.
A G2 rating of 4.5/172 across a broad user base is among the most reliable signals in this list.
A $25M Series B makes Osano one of the better-funded options, which matters for teams evaluating vendor longevity.

Cons

The trade-offs are price and the fine print on the guarantee.

Osano runs expensive for smaller teams. The Plus plan at $199/mo is above most SMB CMP budgets, and the G2 aggregate notes it “may be challenging for smaller organizations with tight budgets.”
The no-fines guarantee is narrower than it first appears. It excludes the free Solo and the $199 Plus plans, applying only to the higher Basic Privacy and Enterprise tiers, and not to violations predating the Osano deployment.
Visitor caps (5,000 on free, 30,000 on Plus) force tier jumps for higher-traffic sites, which are priced at “Basic Privacy” or custom “Enterprise” levels.

Pricing

Osano Solo is free for 5,000 visitors. Plus is $199/mo covering 3 domains and 30,000 visitors. Basic Privacy and Enterprise are custom pricing. See Osano’s current plans for details.

What Users Say

The consensus is positive on usability, with cost the recurring caveat. A G2 review summary cites “ease of use and responsive customer support.” The same aggregate notes that users find it expensive.

Review our Osano review, explore Osano alternatives, or compare Consently vs Osano.

6. Enzuzo: Best for Agencies and Shopify or Webflow Stores

Enzuzo scores 3.9/5. It pairs six legal generators, native Shopify and Webflow integrations, real DSAR tooling, and Google CMP certification. That mix makes it the strongest choice for agency workflows across multiple platforms.

Key Features

Enzuzo combines a certified CMP, native store integrations, and legal generators in one account.

Google-certified CMP with six legal document generators (cookie policy, privacy policy, terms, DPIA, data retention, and DSAR policy)
Native Shopify and Webflow app integrations alongside GTM and standard script
Real DSAR management built in (not gated to an enterprise tier)
Free at $0 for 5,000 visitors; Pro 10 domains at $79/mo ($59 annual); up to $99/mo
Visitor-cap model: tiers gate by visitor volume (5,000 to 30,000); geo-targeting and full DSAR gated upward

Pros

The strengths are agency reach and bundled legal tooling.

Agency focus is genuine: native Shopify, Webflow, and broad CMS compatibility from one account, with multi-domain pricing at $79/mo for 10 domains.
Six legal generators in one platform reduce the number of SaaS tools an agency needs to manage for client compliance work.
A G2 rating of 4.6/18 is strong. The small base size is the caveat, but the quality of reviews is consistent.
Independent reviewers at Comparitech named it a top pick for agencies managing multiple domains.

Cons

The weak points are visitor-cap budgeting, tier gating, and a thin review base.

Visitor caps force tier jumps for client sites with seasonal or spiky traffic, which makes annual budgeting harder.
Geo-targeting and full DSAR management are gated to higher tiers; the entry-level plan does not cover them.
The G2 review count of 18 is the smallest in this list; the rating is credible but not statistically robust.
Support quality is uneven according to user feedback; response times vary.

Pricing

Enzuzo free covers 5,000 visitors. Pro 10 domains is $79/mo ($59 annual). See Enzuzo pricing for current tiers and visitor limits.

What Users Say

Reviews are limited but consistent, praising the multi-domain and Shopify or Webflow coverage. The G2 aggregate sits at 4.6/18, a strong score on a small sample.

Read our Enzuzo review, explore Enzuzo alternatives, or see Consently vs Enzuzo.

7. CookieYes: Best for Budget WordPress Beginners

CookieYes scores 3.8/5. With 1.5M+ WordPress installs, ISO 27001, and a free tier that covers small sites, it is the default starting point for WordPress users. The tradeoffs are per-domain pricing at scale and a narrowed free tier.

Key Features

CookieYes leads on WordPress reach and certification at an entry price.

1.5M+ WordPress installs; native WP plugin rated 4.8/5 on WordPress.org
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Google CMP certification, IAB TCF 2.3 (TCF, GPC, and geo-targeting gated to Pro at $25/mo)
Free tier: 5,000 pageviews, 100 pages per scan; banner color customization moved to paid in 2025
Per-domain pricing: Basic $10, Pro $25, Ultimate $55/mo per domain, plus $0.30 per 1,000 overages
No Terms and Conditions generator

Pros

The strengths are maturity, certification, and consistent cross-platform ratings.

It is easy to set up, customize, and deploy, with responsive customer service, per a Capterra review.
1.5M+ installs signal a mature, well-tested WordPress plugin with a large community and broad compatibility.
ISO 27001, SOC 2, and Google CMP certification at entry-level prices make it one of the best-certified SMB tools.
G2 4.8/298, Trustpilot 4.8/330, and WordPress.org 4.8 form one of the most consistent cross-platform ratings in this roundup.

Cons

The drawbacks are mobile performance, a narrowing free tier, and per-domain cost.

Page-speed impact on mobile is a recurring complaint, not an isolated report. One reviewer reported a “horrible experience” with “websites very slow on mobile after installing the banner.” Test on your actual site before committing.
The free tier narrowed in 2025: banner color customization now requires a paid plan. Gradually restricting the free tier reduces long-term trust.
Scanner accuracy gaps are documented. Some cookies are missed, particularly on sites with dynamic loading or complex third-party scripts.
Per-domain pricing compounds at scale. Five sites on Pro cost $125/mo ($1,500/yr), the main reason multi-site agencies look elsewhere.

Pricing

CookieYes offers a free plan at 5,000 pageviews and 100 pages per scan. Basic is $10/mo, Pro $25/mo, Ultimate $55/mo, all per domain, plus overage at $0.30/1,000 pageviews. See CookieYes pricing for current rates. Unlike Consently’s flat bundling, running five domains on CookieYes Ultimate costs $2,750/yr.

What Users Say

Cross-platform sentiment is strongly positive on ease of use, with mobile speed the main recurring complaint. Ratings hold near 4.8 across G2 (298), Trustpilot (330), and WordPress.org.

Read our CookieYes review, browse CookieYes alternatives, or compare Consently vs CookieYes for a direct pricing breakdown.

8. Termly: Best for Free Policy Generation and Consent Together

Termly scores 3.8/5. Its policy-generator-led model, 10 attorney-crafted document generators, and Google Gold Tier certification make it the strongest bundle of consent plus legal documents in this tier.

Key Features

Termly leads with attorney-crafted documents bundled into a certified consent banner.

10 attorney-crafted policy generators with auto-updating content: cookie policy, privacy policy, terms, disclaimer, EULA, and more
Google Gold CMP certification, Google Consent Mode v2, IAB TCF 2.3
Free tier: 1 policy, 10,000 monthly views, quarterly scans, GDPR-only, Termly watermark
Per-site pricing: Starter $10/mo, Pro+ $15/mo, Agency custom
If you cancel, hosted policies go offline; consider export options before subscribing

Pros

The strengths are the policy library, certification value, and a solid review base.

Setup is intuitive end-to-end. A software engineer on G2 noted: “Getting the embed codes, generating the policies, and doing the scans is very intuitive. The documentation is good too.”
Auto-updating policies eliminate the manual overhead of keeping legal documents current as laws change.
Capterra 4.7/80 and Trustpilot 4.7/571 are consistent. The 571-review Trustpilot base is one of the more statistically meaningful signals in this list.
Google Gold Tier at $10 to $15/mo per site is underpriced relative to tools charging $96/mo per domain for equivalent certification.

Cons

The trade-offs are aggressive Pro+ gating, hosting lock-in, and no DSAR.

Smaller businesses may find the cost high for what the entry tiers include. A product manager on Capterra wrote that “the pricing structure could be more flexible.”
Key features (geo-targeting, branded banners, automatic policy enforcement) are gated to Pro+. The Starter plan is closer to the free tier than to a full compliance setup.
If you cancel your subscription, Termly-hosted policies go offline. Migrating policy hosting before cancellation is a documented friction point.
No DSAR management. Teams with subject access request obligations need a separate tool.

Pricing

Termly Free covers 1 policy, 10,000 monthly views, and quarterly scans with a watermark. Starter is $10/mo per site ($14 billed monthly), Pro+ is $15/mo per site ($20 monthly), and Agency is custom. Consent Mode v2 (advanced) and IAB TCF 2.3 sit on Pro+. See Termly pricing for full tier details.

What Users Say

Reviewers consistently praise the guided policy-and-banner workflow, with pricing flexibility the main critique. Both quotes above are drawn from Termly’s G2 and Capterra profiles, which sit at 4.7 across a large base.

Explore our Termly review, compare Termly alternatives, or see the Consently vs Termly breakdown.

9. Consently: Best for Agencies That Need Flat Multi-Domain Pricing

Consently scores 3.7/5 and ranks ninth of eleven. We are the team behind this article, and Consently is our product. It is included here at its honestly earned rank, not placed first. Consently is the best choice for agencies, freelancers, and multi-site owners who need every compliance feature across multiple domains. The wedge is a flat annual price rather than per-domain billing.

Why Consently Fits the Multi-Site Buyer

The core math: five domains on CookieYes Ultimate costs $2,750 per year. Five domains on Consently Premium costs $199 per year. Ten domains on Consently Enterprise is $499 per year.

That is not a marginal difference. For an agency managing five client sites, per-domain pricing at the incumbents’ rates turns a compliance tool into a significant annual line item. Consently’s flat-capacity model (a fixed number of domains and pageviews per year) makes that cost predictable and linear.

Every Consently plan includes every feature, with nothing gated to higher tiers. That spans IAB TCF 2.3, Consent Mode v2, scanning, auto-blocking, a 35-language banner, three policy generators, a multi-site dashboard, and live chat. See flat multi-domain consent management for the full economics, or explore the Consently platform for a feature overview.

Key Features

Cookie consent banner: Fully customizable layouts, colors, fonts, branding, and custom CSS. Includes GDPR opt-in and CCPA opt-out templates, automatic geotargeting, a preference center, a floating revisit button, and 35 banner languages.

Scanning and auto-blocking: Automatic full-site scan, weekly scheduled rescans, cookie categorization, script and iframe blocking before consent. Limitation: advanced script blocking is in progress; some scripts may execute partially before consent if not manually wrapped (documented on Consently’s own feedback board).

Compliance: Google Consent Mode v2, IAB TCF 2.3 (verified live 2026-06-23), Additional Consent AC v2. GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, PIPEDA, LGPD, and several other regimes. EU (Frankfurt) data hosting. WCAG 2.2 AA accessible banners.

Policy generators: Three generators (cookie policy, privacy policy, terms and conditions) with guided workflows, multi-language output (10+ languages), and direct website embedding.

Multi-site management: Per-site and multi-site dashboards, single-account agency use, domain swapping, and subdomain consent sharing.

Integration paths: One-line JavaScript, Google Tag Manager (Custom HTML tag), Cloudflare Zaraz, and a WordPress plugin (pending official WP.org directory listing). It also works on any platform that accepts a head script, including Webflow, Wix, Squarespace, Shopify, Framer, and Dorik.

Best Use Cases

Agency managing five to ten client sites: The flat Premium plan ($199/yr, 5 domains) or Enterprise plan ($499/yr, 10 domains) makes compliance a predictable overhead. It replaces a per-client line item with one dashboard, one login, and all features.

Cost-conscious SMB wanting an all-in-one setup including Terms: Consently is one of few tools at this price point that includes a Terms and Conditions generator. Teams that need cookie policy, privacy policy, and terms in one place, without a separate legal-document tool, will find the bundle compelling.

International site needing multi-language banners: 35 banner languages ship with automatic geotargeting (EU opt-in, US opt-out). The entry plan covers most international compliance needs without an upgrade.

Pros

The strengths concentrate on pricing model, feature parity across plans, and bundled documents.

Early users praise the time savings and easy branding. One AppSumo review reads: “The auto-scanning feature saves me so much time, and customizing the cookie banner to match my brand was super easy.”
All features on every plan means no feature-gating surprises. IAB TCF, weekly scanning, geo-targeting, and live chat are all available on the $99/yr Basic plan.
Live chat support sits on all plans, versus email-only on Cookiebot’s lower tiers.
Three policy generators including Terms and Conditions, where most tools in this tier generate only cookie and privacy policies.
Built by Dorik (profitable, bootstrapped since 2020), a credibility anchor for a product launched in October 2025.

Cons

The limitations are real, and several are the kind a buyer must weigh carefully.

Advanced script blocking is incomplete. Consently’s own feedback board documents a script-leak issue: scripts can execute partially before consent is given unless manually wrapped. This is a material compliance gap for sites with aggressive third-party tag deployments. The team has this listed as in progress.
Google CMP Partner listing is pending, not approved. Consently cannot currently be listed as a verified Google CMP partner. Cookiebot, Termly, and Enzuzo hold the Google Gold Tier. This matters for teams where Google CMP certification is a procurement check.
No ISO 27001 or 27701 certification. Several tools in this list (CookieYes, iubenda, OneTrust, CookieHub) hold ISO 27001. Consently does not.
No Global Privacy Control (GPC) support. GPC signal detection is not implemented. For US sites with California visitors, GPC handling is an emerging compliance requirement.
No DSAR management, no A/B testing, no mobile SDK, no white-label sub-accounts. These are gaps relative to Enzuzo, Osano, and OneTrust.
Thin review base. Approximately 25 AppSumo reviews and near-zero independent G2/Capterra coverage. The product is eight months old and the review footprint reflects that.
No native Shopify app. Works via script on Shopify but does not integrate with Shopify’s native Customer Privacy API, which is the cleanest compliance path for Shopify merchants.
API access vs. feedback board conflict. The current pricing page lists API access; Consently’s own feedback board listed it as a requested feature. Verify current API status in-product before relying on it.

Pricing

Three flat annual tiers scale by domains and pageviews, with every feature on each:

Plan	Price	Domains	Pageviews/mo	Features
Basic	$99/yr ($8.25/mo)	1	100,000	All features
Premium	$199/yr ($16.50/mo)	5	1,000,000	All features
Enterprise	$499/yr ($41.50/mo)	10	3,000,000	All features

14-day free trial, no credit card required. No free-forever tier. All features are included on every plan. See Consently pricing for current rates, then start a free trial (linked in the verdict below).

What Users Say

The review base is small, about 25 AppSumo reviews, and skews positive on ease of use. One early reliability complaint is worth surfacing honestly. A pre-revamp AppSumo reviewer reported a scan still queued after 12 hours. That review predates the scanner revamp shipped in early 2026, though the documented script-blocking gap remains.

See our full Consently review and scorecard for the complete seven-dimension breakdown.

10. iubenda: Best for Legal Documents Plus Consent in One Suite

iubenda scores 3.6/5. Its 2,400+ lawyer-drafted legal clauses, 27-language document output, and ISO 27001 make it the strongest pure compliance-document suite in this roundup. The tradeoff is a steep learning curve and complex navigation.

Key Features

iubenda is built around the deepest legal-document library in this list, with a certified banner attached.

2,400+ lawyer-drafted clauses across cookie policy, privacy policy, terms, and cookie consent banner
27 languages for document output; GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, and multiple regimes covered
Google-certified CMP, IAB TCF 2.2 (note: other tools have migrated to 2.3), Consent Mode v2, WCAG AAA
ISO 27001; Essentials EUR4.99/mo ($5.99 USD), Advanced EUR19.99/mo ($24.99), Ultimate EUR79.99/mo ($99.99) per site, plus EUR0.05/1,000 pageview overage
G2 Ease of Setup score: 5.0/10 (the lowest in this list)

Pros

The strengths are legal depth and certification at an entry price.

Reviewers rate the value highly. A Capterra review calls it “by far the best and most cost-effective solution compared to its competitors.”
2,400+ lawyer-drafted clauses are an unmatched depth for teams with complex data-processing requirements who want document-level legal coverage, not generic templates.
ISO 27001 at entry pricing is notable; most ISO-certified tools sit in the mid-market or enterprise tier.
Capterra 4.7/190, G2 4.6/44, and Trustpilot 4.5/588 represent a credible, broad review base.

Cons

The trade-offs are usability, overage billing, and an older TCF version.

The interface is genuinely complex. A G2 reviewer listed “complexity, difficult navigation, expensive, learning curve” as drawbacks, and the G2 Ease of Setup score of 5.0/10 is the lowest in this list.
EUR0.05 per 1,000 pageview overage creates unpredictable billing for high-traffic or seasonal sites.
IAB TCF 2.2 rather than 2.3. Most ad-tech platforms already require the newer version; verify vendor compatibility before choosing iubenda for a programmatic context.
Per-site pricing. Five sites on Advanced is EUR99.95/mo ($124.95), among the more expensive options at the multi-site scale.

Pricing

iubenda Essentials is EUR4.99/mo ($5.99 USD) per site, Advanced EUR19.99/mo ($24.99), and Ultimate EUR79.99/mo ($99.99), plus EUR0.05/1,000 pageviews overage. The Advanced plan is the first tier with Terms plus all languages. See iubenda pricing for current rates.

What Users Say

Sentiment is positive on value and depth, with usability the consistent complaint. The two quotes above, drawn from iubenda’s Capterra and G2 profiles, capture the split: strong cost-effectiveness against a steep learning curve.

Read our iubenda review, browse iubenda alternatives, or compare Consently vs iubenda.

11. OneTrust: Best for Large Enterprise Governance

OneTrust scores 3.6/5 overall, but that score reflects how poorly it fits most SMB buyers rather than product weakness. For large enterprise teams with privacy governance requirements, OneTrust is the industry-standard platform.

Key Features

OneTrust is a full privacy-governance suite, the deepest and most expensive option here.

45M-cookie database, 250+ language support, A/B testing for consent rate optimization
Full privacy governance suite: DSAR management, data mapping, vendor risk, CTV SDKs
Gartner Magic Quadrant leader, Forrester Wave leader; used by enterprise organizations globally
No free tier, no free trial; quote-only pricing with an estimated floor of ~$10,000/yr (median ~$11,500/yr per Vendr)
Meters on average daily visitors; enterprise contracts include a multi-year commitment

Pros

The strengths are governance depth, unmatched feature breadth, and analyst recognition.

It is the enterprise industry standard, with technical customization and scalability cited as top strengths on Capterra.
The 45M-cookie database, A/B testing for banner optimization, and CTV SDK support are features no other tool in this list offers. For an enterprise managing consent across web, mobile, and connected TV, it is effectively the only option.
Gartner and Forrester analyst recognition carries procurement weight in enterprise buying cycles.
The G2 seller rating is 4.4/283, though G2’s Consent and Preferences category-specific score is 3.5/16; the 4.4 reflects the full OneTrust platform.

Cons

The drawbacks are cost, renewal practices, opacity, and implementation weight.

Renewal pricing draws sharp criticism. A Trustpilot reviewer called the “renewal tactics completely shady and borderline extortion,” and the 1.5/30 Trustpilot score (the lowest here) is driven by reported 30 to 50% annual increases.
No free trial means budget approval and legal review are required before any hands-on evaluation.
Quote-only pricing makes budgeting opaque. Vendr’s published median of ~$11,500/yr is the most reliable public signal; actual pricing varies significantly by contract.
Complexity and onboarding time are significant. OneTrust is a full privacy-management platform, not a drop-in cookie banner. Expect weeks of implementation, not minutes.

Pricing

OneTrust pricing is quote-only. Reported estimates: floor ~$10,000/yr, median ~$11,500/yr (Vendr data). Metered on average daily visitors. See OneTrust pricing for enterprise inquiry details.

What Users Say

OneTrust splits hard: enterprise buyers respect the platform’s depth, while renewal pricing dominates the negative reviews. The G2 seller score (4.4/283) and the Trustpilot score (1.5/30) bracket that divide, and both quotes above are drawn from those profiles.

Read our OneTrust review, browse OneTrust alternatives, or see Consently vs OneTrust for a direct comparison at the SMB level.

What Is the Best Cookie Consent Tool?

Cookiebot (4.0/5) is the best cookie consent tool for most sites. Its 13,000+ cookie repository delivers the strongest automatic scanning accuracy in this list. Google Gold Tier certification covers Consent Mode v2 and IAB TCF 2.3, and it supports 47 languages with automatic GPC honoring. The main trade-off is per-domain pricing with an auto-upgrade clause that can surprise teams as their subpage count grows.

For different requirements, the best choice changes by use case.

Free WordPress use: Complianz (3.9/5), with no pageview caps and IAB TCF certification at $0 on WordPress.
A truly free banner for a simple site: a lightweight script like Silktide or Ketch Free, if you can forgo automatic scanning and a managed dashboard.
Developer control and white-label: Cookie Script (4.0/5), with the best GTM integration and a white-label agency layer.
Full privacy program with a no-fines pledge: Osano (3.9/5), with DSAR management and a $500,000 penalty guarantee on its higher Basic Privacy and Enterprise tiers.
Agencies managing multiple domains: Consently (3.7/5), where five domains at $199/yr and ten at $499/yr undercut every per-domain tool in this list.
Legal documents plus consent in one tool: iubenda (3.6/5) or Termly (3.8/5), with attorney-drafted generators and consent in one platform.
Large enterprise governance: OneTrust (3.6/5), which despite the lowest score here is the Gartner and Forrester leader for enterprise privacy programs.

The best consent management platform roundup covers a broader set of enterprise and mid-market platforms if these eleven tools do not include the right fit.

If your team runs five or more sites and per-domain billing is the constraint, Consently’s flat pricing makes the math simple. The trial runs 14 days with no credit card required.

Start your free Consently trial

FAQs

What is the best free cookie consent tool?

The best free cookie consent tool for WordPress is Complianz. It has no pageview caps, no watermark, IAB TCF certification, and 1M+ installs. For non-WordPress sites, Cookie Script’s free plan covers 10 pages and 2 domains, and CookieYes free handles up to 5,000 pageviews. Fully free banner scripts like Silktide and Ketch Free also suit a simple static site without scanning needs.

Is there a truly free cookie banner, or do they all charge?

Several tools offer genuine free-forever tiers. Complianz (WordPress) is unlimited with no watermark. Cookie Script, CookieYes, CookieHub, Osano, Enzuzo, Termly, and iubenda all have free plans with specific caps on pageviews, sessions, or domains. The catch is that free tiers are narrowing: CookieYes moved color customization to paid in 2025, and Termly’s free tier adds a watermark. No tool here is both unlimited and fully featured on a free plan.

Do I legally need a cookie consent tool?

GDPR (EU/EEA) requires informed, documented consent before placing non-essential cookies. CCPA (California) requires a “Do Not Sell” opt-out mechanism and clear disclosure. Both laws impose fines for non-compliance: GDPR up to EUR20M or 4% of annual global turnover, CCPA up to $7,500 per intentional violation. A cookie consent tool is the practical mechanism for meeting both requirements without hand-coding. For context on what happens without one, see what is a consent management platform.

What is the best cookie consent tool for WordPress?

For WordPress, the two strongest choices are Complianz and CookieYes. Complianz is free, self-hosted, IAB TCF certified, and better for data-sovereignty needs and cache-free setups. CookieYes (1.5M+ installs) is easier to configure and more widely used. Dedicated plugins like WPConsent and Real Cookie Banner are also worth a look for plugin-first teams.

What is the best cookie consent tool for Shopify?

For Shopify, Enzuzo integrates natively and includes a native app alongside strong legal document generation. Complianz also has a Shopify app ($2.99 to $14.99/mo). CookieYes and Consently both work on Shopify via script. Neither integrates with Shopify’s Customer Privacy API as cleanly as a native app, the cleanest compliance path for merchants.

Do these tools support Google Consent Mode v2 and IAB TCF?

All eleven tools in this list support Google Consent Mode v2. IAB TCF coverage varies by tier: Cookiebot, Complianz, CookieYes, Termly, Enzuzo, and Consently support IAB TCF on standard paid plans. Cookie Script gates IAB TCF 2.3 to the PLUS plan. CookieHub gates it to Business. iubenda supports IAB TCF 2.2 (older version). OneTrust supports full TCF on enterprise contracts. IAB TCF 2.3 is the current version, so verify a vendor’s exact version before a programmatic deployment.

What is the best cookie consent tool for agencies or multiple sites?

For agencies, flat-pricing tools beat per-domain tools at scale. Consently covers 5 domains for $199/yr and 10 for $499/yr, with all features included. Enzuzo’s Pro plan covers 10 domains at $79/mo with native Shopify and Webflow integrations. Cookie Script’s white-label layer is the best option when client-facing branding matters. The math favors flat or bundled pricing once you pass three or four client sites.

What is the difference between a cookie consent tool and a cookie consent plugin?

A cookie consent plugin is a platform-specific implementation. Examples are a WordPress plugin from the WP.org directory (Complianz, CookieYes) or a Shopify app from the Shopify App Store (Enzuzo). A cookie consent tool, or CMP, is the broader category. It includes any platform delivering these capabilities via a script, plugin, GTM tag, or app. The plugin is the delivery mechanism; the CMP is the category. Most tools here are both.