13 Best Cookiebot Alternatives in 2026 (Ranked by Compliance Score)

The strongest Cookiebot alternative for most switchers is CookieScript or CookieYes for one or two sites. If per-domain billing is why you are leaving, pick Consently, Complianz, or Enzuzo. Consentmo wins for Shopify (4.1, the highest score here), Osano for a compliance guarantee, and ConsentManager for ad-supported publishers.

Stay on Cookiebot only if you run a single small site, value its 13,000-cookie scanner, and the August 2025 price increase did not affect you.

The 13 tools below are ranked by the same 7-factor compliance score we apply to every consent management platform we review.

Below: a quick list, why people switch from Cookiebot, the switching criteria, a comparison table, and migration-focused detail for each option.

Best Cookiebot Alternatives at a Glance

These 13 tools are ordered by switching-fit tier first, then by independent review score within each tier. Each entry names the specific Cookiebot problem it solves.

Disclosure: This guide is written by the Consently team. Consently competes with Cookiebot and every tool on this list. It appears in the ranking, scored by the same rubric as everyone else (not self-ranked first). Its score of 3.7 reflects real limitations.

How we score: Every product carries the overall score from our published review methodology, which weights Compliance, Scanning, Banner, Setup, Pricing, Performance, and Support. The list is ordered by switching-fit tier, then by that score. Read the full method at how we review consent management software.

Why People Switch from Cookiebot

Cookiebot earns its 4.0 score. Its scanner is one of the deepest in the category, and it holds Google CMP Gold certification. Across 178 G2 reviews, it averages 4.2 out of 5. If you manage a single small site and your budget is flexible, those are real strengths.

The switching conversation is loud and public. Reddit ranks second on Google for "cookiebot alternatives," above every vendor page. The recurring thread titles are explicit: "Cookiebot open source alternatives (or at least less expensive)" and "Thinking about switching from Cookiebot." Cost is the through-line.

The switching pressure comes from three specific friction points.

Honest carve-out: Some buyers should stay. Keep Cookiebot if you run a single small site, your budget is flexible, and the August 2025 increase did not affect you. Its 13,000-entry scanner, Google CMP Gold certification, and deep language coverage remain genuinely strong. The alternatives below outperform it specifically on multi-domain pricing, predictable billing, and platform-native setup.

How to Choose a Cookiebot Alternative

Before comparing prices and features, identify which Cookiebot frustration is actually driving your search. The four criteria below map to the reasons teams leave.

Pricing model: per-domain vs flat

Per-domain billing is what pushes most teams off Cookiebot, and it scales badly. If you run more than two domains, flat-rate bundled plans (Consently, Complianz) cost a fraction of per-domain alternatives at equivalent coverage. Session-based (CookieHub) and pageview-based (ConsentManager) models change the risk profile again. Map the model to your domain count and traffic before anything else.

Compliance framework coverage

Verify GDPR, CCPA, Google Consent Mode v2, and IAB TCF 2.3 are all covered, not just GDPR. The framework most switchers under-check is IAB TCF, which several tools gate behind their top tier. If you run programmatic ads, confirm the entry point and price for TCF before you commit.

Scanner quality and cadence

Weekly automated scans are the baseline. Tools that scan on demand or only quarterly leave you exposed when a new tag fires. Cookiebot's scanner is one of its real strengths, so a replacement should match its scan depth and cadence, not regress on them.

CMS and platform fit

WordPress-native plugins (Complianz) behave differently from SaaS overlays (CookieYes, Consently) and Shopify-native apps (Consentmo). Neither is universally better; it depends on your stack. Match the tool to where your sites actually live, because a mismatch creates the exact maintenance overhead you are trying to escape.

Cookiebot Alternatives Compared: Scores and Pricing

The table lists every alternative on score, entry price, multi-domain model, and IAB TCF access. Cookiebot sits in the reference row at the top, so you can see exactly what you are leaving. Prices and features verified as of June 2026.

Cookiebot data sourced from its live pricing page. Visit each product's site for current rates.

1. Consentmo: Best for Shopify Stores (4.1/5)

Consentmo is the highest-scoring tool in this pool and the only Shopify-native CMP here. That native status matters for a Cookiebot switcher on Shopify. It installs from the Shopify App Store, syncs with Shopify's customer data layer, and handles the Shopify Plus checkout banner without a custom code workaround.

If you run your store on Shopify, no other tool on this list integrates as cleanly.

Best for: Single Shopify and Shopify Plus stores that want native, certified consent without Cookiebot's script-based install.

Key Features

Consentmo's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Consentmo's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Consentmo's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

Multi-store: contact sales.

What Users Say

Consentmo holds 5.0 stars across more than 1,850 Shopify App Store reviews from a 90,000-plus merchant base. About 1,808 of roughly 1,851 reviews are five-star. One merchant wrote that "the support team has been excellent. They fixed a Microsoft requirement that Microsoft couldn't fix themselves." Criticism points to the price jump to Enterprise for TCF access.

Migrating from Cookiebot to Consentmo

Cookiebot's script-based approach does not carry over to Shopify natively.

Install Consentmo from the Shopify App Store, run the cookie scanner, map your existing cookie categories, and activate Google Consent Mode v2 under Integrations.

For cross-domain consent if you run a separate non-Shopify site, Consentmo's Enterprise plan handles that; otherwise use a separate CMP for the non-Shopify property.

See the Consentmo review, Consentmo alternatives, or Consently vs Consentmo comparison for more detail.

2. CookieScript: Best for Multi-Domain SMBs on a Budget (4.0/5)

CookieScript and Cookiebot share a score of 4.0, but their pricing models are opposite. Cookiebot bills per domain at rates that climb with subpage count. CookieScript prices per domain at a bundled rate. The Plus plan covers unlimited pageviews across 2 to 200 domains, starting at EUR 9/mo for two domains and scaling proportionally.

For an owner with 3 to 10 domains, CookieScript is consistently cheaper than Cookiebot's equivalent coverage.

Best for: Site owners running 3 to 10 domains who want flat-ish per-domain scaling and unlimited pageviews.

Key Features

CookieScript's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

CookieScript's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

CookieScript's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

Prices scale linearly with domain count; 4 domains equals 2x the base rate.

What Users Say

CookieScript holds Trustpilot 4.7 (391 reviews), G2 4.6 (505 reviews), and Capterra 4.8 (57 reviews). One COO on G2 calls the automatic scanning "reliable" and a real manual-work saver. Criticism centers on the free plan's aggressive limits. One G2 reviewer notes the scanner "occasionally does not detect all third-party cookies."

Migrating from Cookiebot to CookieScript

 The self-hosted code option suits teams reducing third-party script dependency.

See the Cookie Script review or Cookie Script alternatives for more.  

3. Axeptio: Best for UX-Forward EU Consent (4.0/5)

Axeptio matches Cookiebot's 4.0 score and holds the highest banner-experience score (4.5/5) of any tool in this pool. Its consent widget is visually distinct: card-based, brand-color-aware, and consistently cited in case studies for opt-in rates of 72% to 84%.

If your conversion rate depends on how your consent banner feels, Axeptio is the most deliberate UX investment here.

Best for: E-commerce and media sites where consent UX directly affects conversion and a polished banner justifies per-domain pricing.

Key Features

Axeptio's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Axeptio's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Axeptio's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

What Users Say

Axeptio holds roughly 4.7 to 4.9 stars on G2, Capterra, GetApp, and Trustpilot. One Capterra reviewer called it easy to integrate and set up on a Shopify store. G2 reviewers describe its support as attentive and responsive. The recurring complaint is per-domain cost and a forced logo on lower tiers.

Migrating from Cookiebot to Axeptio

G2 reviewers report a short learning curve past the first banner that fades with use.

See the Axeptio review or Axeptio alternatives.

4. Complianz: Best WordPress Alternative to Cookiebot (3.9/5)

Complianz is a WordPress-native plugin, which means it runs inside your WordPress dashboard, not as an external SaaS overlay.

For sites built on WordPress, this matters: no separate login, no external script to load, and no additional platform to maintain. It is the most-cited WordPress alternative in both the Google AI Overview and editorial roundups for this query.

Best for: WordPress-first agencies and multi-site operators who want native WP integration and flat annual billing with no pageview cap.

Key Features

Complianz's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Complianz's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Complianz's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

Free WordPress plugin at WordPress.org for basic use. No pageview caps on any paid plan. 30-day money-back.

What Users Say

Complianz carries 1 million-plus active installs and a 4.7/5 rating on WordPress.org. Praise centers on the setup wizard and the breadth of regulations covered. A 2025 WordPress.org support thread titled "Unfortunately no longer a good solution" captured the most common exit: the banner stops appearing in certain browser configurations. The poster's conclusion was direct: "reliability is crucial for GDPR solutions."

Migrating from Cookiebot to Complianz

See the Complianz review or Complianz alternatives.

5. Enzuzo: Best Multi-Domain Alternative for Mid-Market (3.9/5)

Enzuzo's Growth plan ($22/mo annual) covers 4 domains and 10K visitors/mo. Its Pro plan ($59/mo annual) covers 10 domains and 30K visitors/mo.

For owners running 4 to 10 properties who want one SaaS account, Enzuzo offers the clearest domain-bundled path short of Consently's annual flat rate.

Best for: Mid-market teams running 4 to 10 sites that need one account across all domains plus DSAR workflow management.

Key Features

Enzuzo's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Enzuzo's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Enzuzo's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

What Users Say

Enzuzo reviewers praise the multi-domain management interface and the bundled DSAR tools. The setup is rated straightforward (4.5/5 ease score in our methodology). Complaints center on the visitor caps and the per-visitor overage cost if a site exceeds its tier. That makes traffic planning the key budgeting step before committing.

Migrating from Cookiebot to Enzuzo

See the Enzuzo review or Enzuzo alternatives.

6. Osano: Best for Compliance Guarantee Buyers (3.9/5)

Osano's most distinctive feature is a $500,000 "No Fines Guarantee" on its Basic Privacy plan. It covers regulatory penalties arising from consent failures on your platform. No other tool in this pool offers anything equivalent.

For legal teams or risk-averse operators leaving Cookiebot, that guarantee changes the compliance calculus.

Best for: Legal and compliance teams with CCPA and GDPR exposure who want a contractual compliance guarantee.

Key Features

Osano's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Osano's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Osano's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

What Users Say

Osano holds 4.5/5 across 172 G2 reviews and 9/10 on TrustRadius, and appears on Gartner Peer Insights. "Exceptional customer support" is one of the most-repeated themes. The dominant complaint is price: the G2 summary reads "Users find Osano to be expensive," and "Limited Customization" recurs across six mentions. At about $2,388 a year for cookie consent, the cost critique is fair.

Migrating from Cookiebot to Osano

Confirm the No Fines Guarantee terms and visitor caps before relying on the plan.

See the Osano review or Osano alternatives.

7. CookieHub: Best Session-Based Scaler (3.9/5)

CookieHub bills on monthly sessions rather than per domain, which creates a different risk profile from Cookiebot. A site with high traffic but moderate consent volume may hit a session cap before it hits a domain limit.

For a small number of modest-traffic sites, CookieHub's session model is significantly cheaper than Cookiebot's per-domain tiers.

Best for: Sites with steady, moderate traffic that want predictable monthly costs and multi-user access without per-seat fees.

Key Features

CookieHub's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

CookieHub's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

CookieHub's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

What Users Say

Every one of CookieHub's 12 G2 reviews is a perfect 5 stars, with praise centered on easy setup through GTM or a CMS plugin. One reviewer who migrated 16-plus sites notes that configuration changes "require cloning settings for each domain individually," which is time-consuming. The most common complaint is the session-cap surprise for sites that underestimate monthly consent events.

Migrating from Cookiebot to CookieHub

Export your Cookiebot consent records before switching. Install CookieHub via its JavaScript snippet, a GTM template, or a native CMS plugin, then add each domain and run the scanner.

Estimate your monthly sessions carefully, since the bill meters to traffic with a per-session overage. Enable IAB TCF and cross-domain consent on the Business tier if you need them.

See the CookieHub review or CookieHub alternatives.

8. CookieYes: Best for Single-Site SMBs (3.8/5)

CookieYes holds a 4.8 out of 5 rating on its G2 listing and is trusted by over 1.5 million websites. It is the most-cited Cookiebot alternative in both the Google AI Overview and editorial roundups. The setup flow is fast, the visual banner builder needs no code, and Google Consent Mode v2 works out of the box.

For a single website under a million pageviews per month, CookieYes is the most proven value here.

Best for: Single-site operators who want the most widely adopted, proven CMP with a familiar SaaS dashboard at a lower entry rate than Cookiebot.

Key Features

CookieYes's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

CookieYes's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

CookieYes's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

Per domain.

What Users Say

CookieYes earns exceptional ease-of-use reviews and holds 4.8 out of 5 on its G2 listing across a large base, trusted by 1.5 million websites. Praise centers on the visual builder and fast setup. The common complaint is that per-domain pricing still compounds for multi-site operators, just at a lower entry rate than Cookiebot.

Migrating from Cookiebot to CookieYes

Remove Cookiebot's script and export your consent records for the archive. Then install CookieYes via its WordPress plugin or a GTM tag.

The auto-scan will identify cookies and map existing categories to CookieYes's taxonomy. CookieYes's onboarding wizard covers the full flow in under 20 minutes for a single site.

See the CookieYes review, the CookieYes alternatives shortlist, or how CookieYes stacks up against Cookiebot directly for more.

9. CookieFirst: Best for EU-Centric Setup (3.8/5)

CookieFirst is a Dutch CMP with a lean feature set and a free tier that supports real sites. Its compliance focus is EU-first: GDPR is the primary framework, and the banner styles reflect European consent requirements out of the box.

For a small European site with one or two domains, CookieFirst's pricing is competitive with CookieYes and more transparent than Cookiebot.

Best for: European SMBs with one or two domains primarily serving EU visitors who want a GDPR-native tool with a usable free tier.

Key Features

CookieFirst's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

CookieFirst's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

CookieFirst's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Free tier available. Paid plans per domain (for exact current pricing, see the live CookieFirst pricing page, as their page was unavailable at publication). Two-week free trial on paid plans.

What Users Say

CookieFirst earns 4.7/5 on Trustpilot (9 reviews) and 3.7/5 on Capterra (14 reviews). Praise centers on ease of setup and value for EU-first sites. Criticism focuses on per-domain cost at scale and a smaller community footprint than CookieYes or Complianz. That means fewer published guides to lean on during setup.

Migrating from Cookiebot to CookieFirst

Export your Cookiebot consent records, then remove its script. Install CookieFirst via its snippet or CMS plugin, run the scanner, and configure the EU-first banner styles. Enable IAB TCF on a paid plan if needed.

Start on the free tier to test against real traffic before committing, since it supports production sites. Confirm current pricing on the live CookieFirst site, as the rate card was unavailable during research.

See the CookieFirst review or CookieFirst alternatives.

10. Consently: Best for Multi-Domain Cost Control (3.7/5)

Consently is the best fit when per-domain billing is your core Cookiebot problem. Every feature is bundled into a flat annual price across multiple domains. Its 3.7 score is honest and below most of the pool. The platform launched in October 2025, its domain authority is low (DR 17), and it is not yet a recognized category incumbent. Where Consently wins is straightforward: flat-rate multi-domain bundling with every feature on every plan.

Best for: Agencies and developers running 3 to 10 sites who want one flat bill and every compliance feature included from the lowest tier.

Key Features

Consently's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Consently's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Consently's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

All plans: 14-day free trial, no credit card.

What Users Say

Consently's independent review base is still small and young. Its main source of verified feedback is the now-ended AppSumo lifetime deal. It holds about 4.0 out of 5 across roughly 25 AppSumo reviews as of June 2026. There is little organic G2, Capterra, or Reddit discussion yet, and the G2 and Capterra profiles are auto-generated with near-zero organic reviews.

Migrating from Cookiebot to Consently

Export your consent records from Cookiebot Manager before canceling. In Consently, add each domain, run the initial scan, configure your banner, and activate Google Consent Mode v2.

The full setup takes under 30 minutes per domain.

See the Consently review for the scored breakdown before you start the 14-day trial.

11. ConsentManager: Best for Publisher A/B Testing (3.9/5)

ConsentManager is a German CMP built for high-traffic publishers and advertising-dependent sites. Its free plan covers 3,000 PV/mo on one site, with IAB TCF compatibility and full GDPR compliance. The standout feature at paid tiers is A/B testing for consent banners and detailed consent analytics, which most tools here reserve for enterprise.

It fits a narrower case than the Tier 1 picks, which is why it sits below them despite its score.

Best for: Publishers and content sites running programmatic ads that need IAB TCF depth and consent-rate A/B testing at non-enterprise pricing.

Key Features

ConsentManager's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

ConsentManager's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

ConsentManager's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

What Users Say

ConsentManager holds Trustpilot 3.8/5 (30 reviews) and Capterra 4.1/5 (11 reviews). Praise focuses on IAB TCF depth and the A/B testing most tools reserve for enterprise. Criticism centers on setup complexity and the pricing jump after the free tier, which is the main friction for non-publishers evaluating it against simpler tools.

Migrating from Cookiebot to ConsentManager

Export your Cookiebot consent records, then remove its script. Add your site in ConsentManager, install the snippet, and configure the IAB TCF vendor list for your ad stack. Set up daily cookie crawls and A/B test variants from the dashboard.

Budget for per-1,000-pageview overage above your tier allowance, since this is a pageview-metered model.

See the ConsentManager review or ConsentManager alternatives.

12. Termly: Best for Solo Sites With a US Focus (3.8/5)

Termly is built for small US businesses, bloggers, and freelancers who want an all-in-one compliance bundle. One subscription covers cookie consent plus a privacy policy, terms of service, and a CCPA do-not-sell page. Its Pro+ plan covers one site with unlimited banner views, weekly scans, Google Consent Mode v2, and IAB TCF 2.3 for $15/mo, billed annual.

For a solo operator with one domain who needs the full legal document stack, that is a strong value.

Best for: Solo bloggers, freelancers, and US-first small businesses who want consent plus legal documents on one bill.

Key Features

Termly's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

Termly's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

Termly's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

Agency: custom, 10-plus sites.

What Users Say

Termly earns praise for its all-in-one legal document approach and its ease of use (4.5/5 setup score in our methodology). The dominant criticism is per-site pricing compounding for multi-site operators. The free plan's feature set is restricted too, with IAB TCF and Consent Mode v2 gated to Pro+. For a single US site needing the document stack, sentiment is strongly positive.

Migrating from Cookiebot to Termly

Export your Cookiebot consent records, then remove its script. Add your site to Termly, install the banner via its snippet or WordPress plugin, and run the scanner. Generate your privacy policy, terms, and CCPA do-not-sell page from the same dashboard if you need them. Enable IAB TCF and weekly scans on the Pro+ plan.

See the Termly review or Termly alternatives.

13. iubenda: Best for Legal Document Depth (3.6/5)

iubenda scores 3.6 and sits at the bottom of this pool because its consent management is secondary to its primary offering: lawyer-drafted, jurisdiction-specific legal documents. The tool earns its score for compliance coverage but loses ground on scanning automation, performance, and the per-site cost model.

For a Cookiebot switcher whose real need is legal documents, that tradeoff can still be worth it.

Best for: Businesses where legally vetted, jurisdiction-specific policies across many countries are the primary compliance requirement.

Key Features

iubenda's most relevant capabilities for a Cookiebot switcher are these.

Pros

iubenda's genuine strengths are these.

Cons

iubenda's real limitations are these.

Pricing

Plans and the limits that matter for switchers are below.

Overage: $0.05/1K PV. Per-site pricing.

What Users Say

iubenda earns praise for legal document quality and multi-jurisdiction coverage across 150-plus countries. Criticism focuses on the complexity of configuring the banner correctly (3.0/5 setup score) and the cost of IAB TCF access at the Ultimate tier. For teams where legal review of policy content is the bottleneck, the document depth outweighs those limits.

Migrating from Cookiebot to iubenda

Export your Cookiebot consent records, then remove its script. Add your site to iubenda, generate the lawyer-drafted policies for your jurisdictions, and install the consent banner via the snippet. Run the scanner and configure categories, allowing extra setup time given the product's depth. Enable IAB TCF on the Ultimate plan if your ad stack needs it.

See the iubenda review or iubenda alternatives.

The Verdict: Which Cookiebot Alternative Should You Choose?

The right alternative depends on two variables: how many domains you manage and what triggered your search. Here is the decision by switching motivation.

Cookiebot may still be the right choice in one case. That is a single small site, a flexible budget, and no exposure to the August 2025 increase. The alternatives above outperform it specifically on multi-domain pricing, predictable billing, and platform-native setup.

For a broader view of the consent management landscape, see the best consent management platforms compared. For a direct head-to-head, Consently vs Cookiebot shows the full comparison.

If flat multi-domain pricing is what you came for, try Consently free for 14 days, no credit card required. Run every domain on one bill before you commit.

FAQs

What is the best free Cookiebot alternative?

CookieYes and CookieFirst both offer free plans that support real production sites. CookieYes caps its free tier at 5,000 PV/mo; CookieFirst's exact free-tier limit was not verifiable at publication. Complianz also has a free WordPress plugin. For Shopify, Consentmo's free plan has no pageview cap. Under 5,000 visitors a month, CookieYes Free is the most proven no-cost option.

Is there a Cookiebot alternative without per-domain pricing?

Yes. Consently uses flat annual bundles (5 domains at $199/yr). Complianz bundles by site count with no pageview cap ($179/yr for 5 WordPress sites). Enzuzo offers domain-tiered plans where multiple domains are bundled at one monthly rate. CookieHub prices on monthly sessions. ConsentManager prices on monthly pageviews. All four avoid Cookiebot's per-domain compounding.

Can I switch from Cookiebot without losing my consent records?

Yes. Before canceling Cookiebot, export your consent logs from the Cookiebot Manager (Domains section). Most CMPs, including CookieYes, Consently, and Complianz, accept or at least archive imported consent records. Historical consent records are typically stored for auditing; the new tool starts collecting fresh from its activation date. You will not lose historic proof of consent as long as you export before canceling.

What happened to Cookiebot's pricing in August 2025?

On August 18, 2025, Cookiebot changed the Premium Small plan so it is only available for accounts with 4 or more domains. Accounts with 1 to 3 domains on the Small plan were auto-converted to Premium Medium. That doubled the per-domain price from roughly EUR 15 to EUR 30 per month. Customers received email notification on July 14 to 16, 2025, and the pricing page was updated July 17. A separate March 2025 change converted the Extra Large plan to EUR 90/domain/mo.

Does Cookiebot's free plan still exist?

Yes. Cookiebot's free plan covers 1 domain with up to 50 subpages. It does not include automated daily scans, geo-targeting, or the full consent logging features of paid plans. For sites with under 50 pages and no automated scan requirement, the free tier is functional.

Which Cookiebot alternative is best for WordPress?

Complianz is the most recommended WordPress-native alternative. It runs inside your WP dashboard and covers GDPR, CCPA, and IAB TCF 2.3 on all plans. It costs $179/yr for 5 sites with no pageview cap. CookieYes and Consently also have WordPress plugins if you prefer a SaaS CMP with a dashboard outside WordPress.

What are the best Cookiebot alternatives for agencies?

The strongest Cookiebot alternatives for agencies are Consently, Complianz, and Enzuzo, depending on your stack. Consently's Premium plan ($199/yr) covers 5 domains with every feature included; Enterprise ($499/yr) covers 10. Complianz suits WordPress-first agencies at $179/yr for 5 sites. Enzuzo adds white-label on its Agency plan. For agencies where established brand trust is essential, CookieYes is more defensible.

What is the easiest Cookiebot alternative to set up?

CookieYes and Termly consistently earn the highest setup ease scores (4.5/5 in our methodology). Both have visual banner builders, guided setup wizards, and WordPress plugins. Consently and CookieHub also score 4.0/5 on setup. If you need the absolute lowest friction switch, CookieYes's visual builder and 20-minute onboarding are the benchmark.

Do Cookiebot alternatives support Google Consent Mode v2?

Every tool in this list supports Google Consent Mode v2. It is now a required feature for any CMP used on a site running Google Ads in the EU. Verify the specific integration method (GTM tag, direct SDK, or plugin) before switching, particularly if your site uses server-side tagging.

What is the cheapest Cookiebot alternative for multiple domains?

For 5 domains: Consently Premium at $199/yr ($16.50/mo) is the lowest annual cost. Complianz Professional at $179/yr covers 5 WordPress sites. CookieScript Plus at roughly EUR 4.50/domain/mo scales to 5 domains at about EUR 22.50/mo. CookieYes Pro at $10/domain/mo for 5 domains equals $50/mo. Cookiebot Medium for 5 domains equals EUR 150/mo. The gap is substantial for multi-domain operators.