Consently scores 3.7 out of 5. Enzuzo scores 3.9 out of 5. This comparison uses the same seven-dimension rubric we apply to every consent platform we review. Both products serve the same core SMB compliance need. They take opposite approaches to pricing, feature access, and product scope. Whether one beats the other depends entirely on what your site actually requires. Below is the full evidence-based breakdown.
How We Scored Both Products
We use a weighted seven-dimension methodology for every consent platform we evaluate. See the full evidence procedure at how we score every consent management platform.
This comparison is published by the Consently team. Consently competes with Enzuzo. We score both products by the same rubric and call out below where Enzuzo genuinely wins. Consently's score of 3.7 is the same score we published in our standalone review. We do not give ourselves a favorable weighting.
Per-dimension scorecard
The table below scores both products across all seven weighted dimensions, with the edge noted for each.
| Dimension (weight) | Consently | Enzuzo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance and framework coverage (25%) | 3.5 | 4.5 | Enzuzo |
| Cookie scanning and auto-blocking (20%) | 3.0 | 4.0 | Enzuzo |
| Banner and consent experience (15%) | 4.0 | 3.5 | Consently |
| Ease of setup and integrations (15%) | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Pricing and value (15%) | 4.5 | 3.5 | Consently |
| Performance and reliability (5%) | 3.5 | 3.5 | Tie |
| Support and reputation (5%) | 3.0 | 3.5 | Enzuzo |
| Overall | 3.7/5 | 3.9/5 | Enzuzo |
Enzuzo leads on the two heaviest dimensions (compliance coverage and scanning), which together carry 45% of the weight. That is why it scores higher overall despite losing on banner experience and pricing. Consently's stronger pricing score reflects its flat, all-features-included model. Enzuzo's stronger compliance score reflects its broader certification stack and DSAR capability.
Quick Comparison: Consently vs Enzuzo
This table summarizes the head-to-head differences buyers ask about most, with the edge marked for each row.
| Feature | Consently | Enzuzo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our score | 3.7/5 | 3.9/5 | Enzuzo |
| Starting price | $99/yr (1 domain) | $0 free, $7/mo Starter | Enzuzo |
| Free tier | 14-day trial only | Free forever (5K visitors/mo) | Enzuzo |
| Feature gating by tier | None (all features on every plan) | Yes (DSAR, white-label, A/B gated upward) | Consently |
| Monthly visitor cap | No (pageview-based, 100K to 3M) | Yes (5K to 30K, then unlimited on Agency) | Consently |
| Domains (mid tier) | 5 domains at $199/yr | 4 domains at $22/mo ($264/yr) | Consently |
| DSAR management | Not available | Full workflow (Growth+, 20/mo; Pro+ unlimited) | Enzuzo |
| Banner languages | 35 | ~25 | Consently |
| IAB TCF | v2.3 | Compliant (version unstated) | Consently |
| Google CMP Partner | Pending | Gold Partner (certified) | Enzuzo |
| GPC signal handling | No | Yes | Enzuzo |
| Microsoft Consent Mode | No | Yes | Enzuzo |
| Native Shopify app | No (script install) | Yes (3.6/5, 33 reviews) | Enzuzo |
| Native Webflow app | No | Yes | Enzuzo |
| Legal generators | 3 (cookie, privacy, ToS) | 6 (+ EULA, return, SSA, DPA) | Enzuzo |
| A/B testing | No | Enterprise only | Neither at SMB |
| White-label | No | Agency tier ($99/mo) | Enzuzo |
| Live chat support | All plans | Chat (speed varies by tier) | Consently |
| EU data hosting | Frankfurt | Not specified | Consently |
What Is Consently?
Consently is a consent management platform built by Dorik, Inc., a profitable website-builder company operating since 2020. It targets cost-conscious site owners, agencies, and developers who want a compliant cookie banner, auto-scanning, consent logs, and three policy generators in a single purchase.
Its defining idea is flat pricing: every feature is included on every plan. You pay more only for capacity (domains and pageviews), never for access to features. The product launched in October 2025 through an AppSumo lifetime deal and moved to public subscription afterward.
Consently's strongest areas are its banner customization (four display styles, deep CSS control, 35 languages), its predictable multi-domain economics, and its all-plans live chat support. Its honest weaknesses are a maturing scanner, certifications still in progress (Google CMP Partner listing is pending), and no DSAR capability at any plan level. It is not the right tool for Shopify stores that want a native app or teams that need automated data-subject request handling.
What Is Enzuzo?
Enzuzo is an all-in-one privacy compliance platform built by a remote team in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario. It targets SMBs, Shopify and Webflow stores, agencies, and mid-market teams priced out of enterprise suites like OneTrust.
Where Consently covers consent and policies, Enzuzo adds a third pillar: automated DSAR management with intake forms, identity verification, deadline reminders, and 1-click compliance reporting. It also ships dedicated Shopify and Webflow apps, six legal generators, and white-label agency tooling. Its key strength is breadth: one dashboard covers cookie consent, legal documents, and data-request handling that most budget tools split across separate subscriptions.
Enzuzo's honest weaknesses are real. Full DSAR, white-label, and A/B testing require higher plans. Monthly-visitor caps constrain the lower tiers. Users also report slow support below the top plans.
Compliance and Framework Coverage
Enzuzo
Enzuzo holds Google CMP Partner Gold status, which is the top tier of Google's certified partner program. It implements Consent Mode v2 via a Google Tag Manager template and is compliant with IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent Framework. The specific TCF version (2.2 vs 2.3) is not stated on Enzuzo's pages. That is a gap for publishers who must confirm the TCF version for their ad-stack. Enzuzo also holds IAPP Bronze certification and lists GPC (Global Privacy Control) and Microsoft Consent Mode support. Regulation coverage spans GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, LGPD, Quebec Law 25, Saudi PDPL, and PIPEDA.
Its standout compliance differentiator is DSAR management: intake, identity verification, automated deadline reminders, and 1-click compliance reporting. This is the workflow that moves Enzuzo from a cookie tool into a compliance platform. Most budget CMPs have nothing equivalent.
Consently
Consently is certified for Google Additional Consent (AC v2). Its full Google CMP Partner listing is pending approval, which means it is not yet in the official Google CMP Partner directory. IAB TCF is supported at version 2.3 (confirmed live, 2026-06-29), which is the current version. Regulation coverage includes GDPR, CCPA, PIPEDA, and LGPD. Consently does not offer GPC signal handling or Microsoft Consent Mode, and it has no DSAR capability at any plan level.
Verdict
Enzuzo wins compliance coverage. It holds the Gold CMP certification Consently is still waiting on. It adds GPC and Microsoft Consent Mode that Consently does not have. It also brings DSAR handling that Consently lacks entirely. For any site that needs certified partner status today, or any team that handles data-subject requests, Enzuzo is ahead.
Cookie Scanning and Auto-Blocking
Enzuzo
Enzuzo's scanner discovers and categorizes cookies, generates a cookie list embedded in the notice, and blocks non-essential scripts before consent. Geo-targeting is gated to the Growth tier and above, so Free and Starter users get scanning without regional targeting. The feature set is solid: scheduled scans, a pre-categorized cookie database, and real auto-blocking. G2 reviewers and independent sources praise the ease of getting scanning live, though a Shopify reviewer noted the Facebook-cookies section had not populated for them.
Consently
Consently runs automatic full-site scans, weekly scheduled scans, and on-demand scans. Auto-blocking covers cookies, scripts, and iframes before consent. The known gap is prior blocking completeness. Consently's own public feedback board documents that some scripts can leak and execute before consent if they are not manually wrapped. An "advanced script blocking" improvement is listed as in progress. There is also no CSV export of the detected cookie list yet. Early AppSumo reviewers reported scans that queued or failed. The team reports a scanner accuracy revamp has since shipped. The documented leak gap still keeps this dimension mid-pack.
Verdict
Enzuzo wins scanning. Its scanner is more mature, with no documented prior-blocking gaps at the level Consently has logged. Both perform the core scan-and-block job; Enzuzo does it with more reliability evidence and without the documented script-leak edge case.
Banner and Consent Experience
Consently
Consently's banner is one of its strongest areas. Four display styles (bar, box, popup, full-screen) with top, bottom, center, and side positions. Customization runs deep: custom colors, fonts, CSS, font inheritance, custom policy titles, a preference center, and a floating revisit button. Banner content supports 35 languages with automatic language detection from the page's HTML lang attribute. Banners are built to WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility standards. Every feature including the full preference center and all styling options is available on the Basic plan ($99/yr). AppSumo buyers consistently flagged banner customization as a highlight, citing clear controls and an immediate live preview.
Enzuzo
Enzuzo's banner ships with templates, custom colors and text, and custom CSS. It links out to the policy pages Enzuzo generates and supports geo-targeted display by IP region. Language support is approximately 25 (G2 lists exactly 25 EU languages). A recurring complaint in reviews is that customization runs into walls. One reviewer asked, "How on earth do I add a custom bit of copy to the Privacy Policy?" (review roundup, snippet). A G2 reviewer noted "challenges in formatting" with the privacy banner. The feature set is functional, but it stays inside the template model.
Verdict
Consently wins banner and consent experience. Its 35 languages beat Enzuzo's 25 by a meaningful margin for global publishers. Its deep CSS and styling control goes further than Enzuzo's template model. And unlike Enzuzo, every banner capability is available on the cheapest plan with no upgrade required.
Ease of Setup and Integrations
Consently
Consently installs via a JavaScript snippet, a WordPress plugin, and a Google Tag Manager container. Setup is documented as a three-step process. AppSumo buyers reported going live in under 30 minutes with clear controls and an immediate live preview. The honest gap is native platform apps: Consently has no native Shopify app and no native Webflow app. Shopify stores install via the script path, which works but misses the 1-click convenience Enzuzo offers. GTM and Consent Mode v2 are supported on all plans.
Enzuzo
Enzuzo's integration story is its strongest setup advantage. Dedicated Shopify app with 1-click install (no code), a native Webflow marketplace app, a GTM template for Consent Mode, and a standard JavaScript snippet. Shopify and Webflow stores get a native app experience with auto-detection rather than manual script placement. The trade-off is friction on the customization side after setup. One reviewer asked "How on earth do I add a custom bit of copy" (review roundup). A Shopify reviewer "could not add custom policy copy at all." Setup is fast. Deep modification is where the template model constrains.
Verdict
Tie. Consently's setup is fast and clear for most CMS installs. Enzuzo's native Shopify and Webflow apps are a genuine edge for those platforms. For everything else the paths are equivalent.
Pricing and Value
Consently
Consently prices by capacity, not by feature tier. Three plans:
- Basic: $99/yr ($8.25/mo monthly billing), 1 domain, 100,000 pageviews/month
- Premium: $199/yr ($16.50/mo), 5 domains, 1,000,000 pageviews/month
- Enterprise: $499/yr ($41.50/mo), 10 domains, 3,000,000 pageviews/month
Every feature ships on every Consently pricing tier. No tier jump is required for scanning, banner languages, policy generators, API access, or IAB TCF. Pageview limits are shared across domains, reset monthly, and do not trigger an automatic upgrade when exceeded. The alert fires before you hit the ceiling. Subdomains under a root domain count as one domain slot, not separate domains.
There is no free-forever plan. The trial is 14 days with no credit card required.
For a five-domain agency or developer, the math is $199/yr total. Enzuzo's nearest tier, Growth at $22/mo, covers only 4 domains and costs $264/yr. Consently's Premium includes every feature Consently offers across all five domains. Consently has no DSAR or white-label at any tier, so those are not trade-offs in this comparison.
Enzuzo
Enzuzo has a free-forever tier (1 domain, 5,000 monthly visitors, 3 DSARs/month, basic banner and Consent Mode). Paid tiers:
- Starter: $7/mo ($84/yr), 1 domain, 5,000 visitors/month, 10 DSARs/month
- Growth: $22/mo ($264/yr), 4 domains, 10,000 visitors/month, 20 DSARs/month, full DSAR workflow included
- Pro: $59/mo ($708/yr), 10 domains, 30,000 visitors/month, unlimited DSARs, Pro support
- Agency: $99/mo ($1,188/yr, billed yearly only), 20 domains, unlimited visitors and DSARs, white-label
- Enterprise: custom pricing, unlimited everything, A/B testing, advanced API
Additional domains cost $6.50 each on the Agency and Enterprise tiers (live-verified 2026-06-29); lower tiers cannot add domains beyond their included count. Feature gating is real and significant: the full DSAR workflow requires Growth ($264/yr), white-label requires Agency ($1,188/yr), A/B testing requires Enterprise. Monthly-visitor caps force tier jumps as traffic grows.
For a 10-domain site hitting 30,000 visitors per month, the minimum plan is Pro at $708/yr. Consently's Enterprise plan covers 10 domains at $499/yr with no visitor cap.
A G2 reviewer called agency pricing constraining, noting "$129 USD/month is really steep" for aggregating client accounts. Independent sources describe Enzuzo's entry plans as affordable but warn that "feature gating and traffic-based scaling can push costs higher quickly" (iubenda comparison, 2026).
Verdict
Consently wins pricing and value for multi-domain and mid-traffic buyers. Its flat model has no feature gating and a higher pageview ceiling at every tier. That beats Enzuzo's tiered model for teams whose main need is consent and policies across multiple sites. Enzuzo wins for the free tier and low-volume single sites: a business that genuinely needs only one domain and 5,000 visitors/month can start at $0. It also wins for teams that need DSAR, since Consently has no equivalent at any price.
Performance and Reliability
Both platforms claim lightweight scripts that do not impact Core Web Vitals. Enzuzo documents a Lighthouse measurement on its own banner-equipped homepage showing a cumulative layout shift of 0.009, well within Google's 0.1 "good" threshold. Consently makes equivalent performance claims for its script. Neither has independently published a third-party Lighthouse audit as of this writing.
Enzuzo has isolated reliability reports. One Shopify review noted the Facebook-cookies section had not populated. A G2 review described a paid account being unexpectedly reset to free status. These are low-frequency reports, not a systematic pattern. Consently is newer and has a thinner public reliability record. This dimension is a tie: both are in the same performance-claim range without independent lab data to differentiate them.
Support and Reputation
Enzuzo
Enzuzo has G2 4.6/5 across 18 reviews, with 94% at 5 stars and one 0.5-star outlier (a billing reset issue). The Shopify App Store shows 3.6/5 across 33 reviews on the reviews tab (live-verified 2026-06-29), with complaints about double billing and no response from support. Independent sources describe support as "chat-only below Enterprise" with "multi-day replies" (TermsFeed review, snippet; not directly fetched this session due to 403 block). Enzuzo acknowledges differentiated support: Pro tier adds "Pro Support," Agency adds "after-hours support," and Enterprise provides a dedicated success manager. Live chat responsiveness at the Starter and Growth levels is where the complaints cluster.
Consently
Consently offers live chat on all plans. The honest reputation gap is track record: the product launched in October 2025, so the public review record is thin. AppSumo buyers were generally positive on banner customization and setup speed. There is no G2 profile yet. Consently is backed by Dorik, Inc., which provides legitimacy. It has not yet accumulated the volume of third-party reviews that lets a reviewer judge support quality at scale.
Verdict
Enzuzo wins support and reputation on the evidence. It has a larger review base and stronger aggregate scores, despite the support speed complaints. Consently's live-chat-on-all-plans commitment is genuinely better in policy, but policy means less than track record when comparing tools side by side. As Consently's review volume grows, this dimension will be easier to assess.
Who Should Choose Consently
Consently is the better choice for:
- Multi-domain agencies and developers on a budget: 5 domains at $199/yr with every feature included beats Enzuzo's equivalent coverage.
- International sites needing more than 25 languages: 35 languages vs Enzuzo's ~25 is a real difference for multilingual publishers.
- Teams that want predictable pricing with no visitor-cap surprises: the pageview model with no auto-upgrade and no feature gating makes budgeting straightforward.
- Sites prioritizing banner customization depth: Consently's CSS control, four display styles, and full preference center on the $99 plan surpass Enzuzo's template model.
- Buyers who want EU-hosted data: Consently hosts in Frankfurt. Enzuzo does not specify a data region.
- Sites with 100K-plus monthly pageviews on a tight budget: the Basic plan's 100K pageview ceiling is ten to twenty times Enzuzo's Starter and Growth visitor caps.
Who Should Choose Enzuzo
Enzuzo is the better choice for:
- Shopify and Webflow stores that want a 1-click native app with Consent Mode and auto-detection without touching code.
- Teams that need DSAR automation: Enzuzo handles intake, identity verification, deadline reminders, and reporting. Consently has no equivalent at any price.
- Sites needing GPC or Microsoft Consent Mode: Enzuzo supports both. Consently does not.
- Publishers and ad-tech sites that need a certified Google CMP Partner: Enzuzo holds Gold status today. Consently's listing is pending.
- Low-volume single sites: the $0 free tier for one domain and 5,000 visitors/month has no equivalent in Consently's lineup.
- Agencies that want white-label and per-client dashboards: Enzuzo's Agency tier includes both. Consently offers neither.
- Teams that need six legal generators: Enzuzo covers privacy policy, ToS, EULA, return policy, SSA, and DPA. Consently covers three.
Consently vs Enzuzo: Compliance for Specific Use Cases
For Shopify stores
Enzuzo is the clear winner. Its native Shopify app installs in one click and handles Consent Mode v2 and CCPA opt-out without code. It also has a real Shopify review base (3.6/5 across 33 reviews on the reviews tab, live-verified 2026-06-29). Consently requires a script install, which works but lacks the native integration depth. A Shopify store that simply wants to be compliant fast should choose Enzuzo.
For agencies managing many client sites
The decision depends on whether you need white-label and per-client dashboards. If you do, Enzuzo's Agency tier ($99/mo, billed yearly) is the only option between the two. If you do not, Consently's Premium plan (5 domains at $199/yr) covers a typical small agency's site portfolio. Every feature is included with no visitor-cap anxiety, at roughly one-sixth the annual cost. Agencies on tighter margins who manage banner and policy compliance only should look hard at Consently's math.
For teams handling data-subject requests
Enzuzo wins. It is the only tool in this comparison with an automated DSAR workflow. That workflow covers an embeddable intake form, identity verification, automated deadline reminders (45 days for California, 30 days for Europe), and 1-click compliance reporting. Consently does not offer DSAR handling at any tier. Teams subject to GDPR, CCPA, or CPRA data-subject request obligations who need automated tracking should choose Enzuzo.
For multilingual publishers
Consently wins. Thirty-five banner languages with automatic detection from the page's HTML lang attribute beats Enzuzo's approximately 25. One Enzuzo reviewer reported seeing only one language live where more were promised. For sites publishing content in languages outside Enzuzo's EU-focused 25, Consently's coverage is broader.
For small single-domain sites on a budget
Enzuzo's free tier ($0, 1 domain, 5,000 visitors/month, basic banner and Consent Mode) is the only option here. Consently has no free-forever plan, only a 14-day trial. A single-domain site with under 5,000 monthly visitors should try Enzuzo's free tier first. If they want advanced scanning, full DSAR, or more domains, the upgrade path is clear.
Consently vs Enzuzo Pricing: Side-by-Side Math
The pricing comparison matters most at the multi-domain and growth tiers.
For a single domain with low traffic under 5,000 visitors per month, the options are simple.
- Enzuzo Free: $0
- Consently: $99/yr (trial only at $0)
- Winner: Enzuzo
For a single domain at 50,000 pageviews per month, the visitor cap decides it.
- Enzuzo: Starter covers 5,000 visitors; this volume requires Growth at $264/yr
- Consently Basic: $99/yr (100K pageview ceiling)
- Winner: Consently
For five domains at 200,000 pageviews per month total, the gap widens.
- Enzuzo: Growth caps at 4 domains and cannot add a fifth; per-domain add-ons start at the Agency tier. Five domains therefore requires Pro at $708/yr for 10 domains. The 10,000-visitor Growth cap would also force the jump on its own.
- Consently Premium: $199/yr, 5 domains, 1M pageview ceiling
- Winner: Consently by a wide margin
For ten domains in agency use, the annual cost still favors Consently.
- Enzuzo Pro: $708/yr (10 domains, 30K visitors, unlimited DSARs)
- Consently Enterprise: $499/yr (10 domains, 3M pageviews, all features)
- Winner: Consently (if DSAR and white-label are not needed)
The visitor cap is the key variable in Enzuzo's pricing. A site that stays under 5,000 monthly visitors never upgrades. A site with steady or growing traffic will hit a ceiling. Consently's pageview model is more forgiving: 100,000 pageviews on the Basic plan is a much higher ceiling for the same dollar amount.
The Honest Concessions
Where Enzuzo is genuinely better (not hedged)
Enzuzo's DSAR automation is a real capability that Consently has no answer for. If you file GDPR deletion requests, CCPA access requests, or any other data-subject rights, Enzuzo automates a workflow that Consently does not offer. That is not a feature gap that Consently compensates for with pricing.
Enzuzo holds Google CMP Partner Gold status. Consently's listing is pending. For a publisher or ad-tech site whose ad partner requires a certified CMP, Enzuzo qualifies today and Consently does not.
Enzuzo's native Shopify app is a genuine 1-click installation that Consently's script path cannot replicate. Shopify and Webflow stores benefit from Enzuzo's native integration model.
GPC signal handling and Microsoft Consent Mode are both on Enzuzo and absent on Consently. For sites serving US visitors who use GPC-enabled browsers (Firefox, Brave), Enzuzo signals compliance that Consently cannot.
Enzuzo's review track record is larger. G2 rates Enzuzo 4.6/5 across 18 reviews. Its Shopify App Store presence spans 3.6 to 4.7 depending on the surface. Together these give buyers more third-party signal than Consently's thinner post-launch record.
Where Consently is genuinely better (not hedged)
Consently's 35-language banner coverage beats Enzuzo's ~25. For multilingual sites or publishers with global audiences, that matters.
Consently's all-features-on-every-plan model is a real structural advantage for buyers who want predictability. Enzuzo's feature-gating means a Growth customer does not get white-label, A/B testing, or Pro support. Consently does not offer white-label or A/B testing either, but it does not gate any of its actual feature set behind a higher tier.
The flat multi-domain pricing gives Consently a clear advantage for agencies and developers managing 5 to 10 sites. The math in the pricing section above shows Consently is cheaper at the multi-domain tiers for teams that do not need DSAR or white-label.
Consently's EU Frankfurt hosting is a documented data-residency claim. Enzuzo does not specify a data region.
FAQs
Is Consently better than Enzuzo?
Enzuzo scores 3.9/5 and Consently scores 3.7/5 on our seven-dimension rubric. Enzuzo scores higher overall because it leads on compliance coverage (25% weight) and scanning maturity (20% weight). Consently scores higher on pricing and banner experience. Neither is universally better: Enzuzo is better for Shopify stores, DSAR handling, and sites that need a certified Google CMP Partner today. Consently is better for multi-domain agencies on a budget, multilingual publishers, and teams that want flat predictable pricing with no feature gating.
Does Enzuzo have a free plan?
Yes. Enzuzo's free-forever plan covers one domain, 5,000 monthly visitors, 3 DSARs per month, and a basic cookie banner with Google Consent Mode v2. Consently has no free-forever plan: it offers a 14-day trial with no credit card required.
Does Consently handle data subject access requests?
No. Consently does not offer DSAR management at any plan level. Enzuzo (Growth tier and above) has an automated workflow for GDPR deletion requests, CCPA access requests, and other data-subject rights obligations. Consently does not.
What is Enzuzo's pricing compared to Consently?
Enzuzo starts at $0 free. Starter is $7/mo ($84/yr) for 1 domain and 5,000 visitors. Growth is $22/mo ($264/yr) for 4 domains and 10,000 visitors. Pro is $59/mo ($708/yr) for 10 domains and 30,000 visitors. Consently starts at $99/yr for Basic (1 domain, 100,000 pageviews). It then runs $199/yr for Premium (5 domains, 1,000,000 pageviews) and $499/yr for Enterprise (10 domains, 3,000,000 pageviews). Consently has no visitor cap and no feature gating. Enzuzo's entry price is lower; Consently is cheaper at the five-domain and ten-domain tiers.
Does Enzuzo support more languages than Consently?
No. Enzuzo supports approximately 25 languages. Consently supports 35 banner languages with automatic detection. For multilingual publishers, Consently's language coverage is broader.
Is Enzuzo a Google-certified CMP?
Yes. Enzuzo holds Google CMP Partner Gold status (the top certification tier). Consently is certified for Google Additional Consent (AC v2). Its full Google CMP Partner listing is pending approval as of June 2026.
Can I use Consently on Shopify?
Yes, but only via a JavaScript script install, not a native app. Enzuzo has a dedicated Shopify app with 1-click installation and Shopify Plus support. For Shopify stores that prefer a native app experience, Enzuzo is the better fit.
Which tool is better for agencies?
It depends on what agency capability you need. If you need white-label banners and per-client dashboards, only Enzuzo offers them (Agency tier, $99/mo billed yearly). If you manage 5 to 10 client sites without white-labeling, Consently's Premium or Enterprise plan covers the domain count at a lower annual cost. Every feature is included with no visitor-cap risk.
Verdict: Consently vs Enzuzo
Enzuzo is the right choice when you need DSAR automation, a certified Google CMP Partner, or a native Shopify or Webflow app. It also fits buyers who need GPC handling or white-label tooling. It earns its 3.9/5 score on compliance breadth and scanning maturity.
Consently is the right choice when you need flat predictable pricing across 5 to 10 domains, more banner languages, or EU-hosted data. It fits when DSAR, GPC, and a certified Google CMP Partner are not hard requirements. It earns its 3.7/5 score on its all-features pricing model and banner experience.
Here is the call for most SMBs choosing between the two. If your site runs on Shopify or Webflow, or if you handle data-subject requests at any volume, start with Enzuzo's free tier at enzuzo.com/pricing. If you manage multiple domains and want no surprises on your bill or feature set, start a 14-day Consently trial and test every feature first.
For the standalone scored evaluation, see our Enzuzo review. If the visitor caps or feature-gating are a blocker, explore Enzuzo alternatives for the full ranked roundup.
